Subscribe to this BlogEconomists do poor job of job forecasting
An unemployment rate in the double digits isn't surprising, but it arrived earlier than most economists were expecting.
I know this because I put the finishing touches on MONEY’s outlook for the 2010 job market less than a week before last Friday's unemployment report came out — the report announcing that the jobless rate had surged from 9.8% to 10.2% in October. Economists I had been talking to only days earlier hadn't forecast a rate that high. And it wasn't just the people I spoke to who had low-balled the number: In mid-October, the Blue Chip Economic Indicators newsletter, which captures the consensus forecast of more than 48 economists, reported that the jobless rate was expected to peak at 10.1% in the first quarter of 2010. And the National Association for Business Economists, which presents 44 economic forecasts, projected in October that unemployment would rise to 10% in the first quarter of next year and edge down to 9.5% by the end of 2010.
So, does reaching the grim double-digit unemployment milestone sooner mean that unemployment is going to go significantly higher than anticipated next year? Or could it mean that the worst is over and the job market is recovering more quickly than expected?
My predictive powers are no stronger than an economist's. But there were some signals of improvement in the October job news that give me hope that unemployment won’t significantly worsen next year.
Those signs include a slowdown in the rate of job losses. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, between November 2008 and April 2009 the economy shed an average of 645,000 jobs a month. Between May and July, the pace dropped to an average monthly loss of 357,000 jobs. Over the last three reports, average monthly job losses have slipped to 188,000. Meanwhile, the number of temporary workers being hired rose 44,000 in October, the third month in a row that the temp sector posted gains. Adding temporary workers is one of the first signs that companies have stopped cutting their workforces and need to bring in new workers to get the work done. The number of weekly hours worked even ticked up to an average 33.1 hours in October from 32.9 in September.
Of course, no one is expecting a swift drop in the unemployment rate. It’s likely to remain at these elevated levels for most of 2010. But the job market does seem to be slowly getting better, not deteriorating. Let's hope that prediction is correct.
Follow More Money on Twitter at http://twitter.com/moremoneyblog.
I am not going to vote because even though the company I work for – J.Lodge http://www.jlodge.com is expanding, each of us has left the workforce because we are disabled. However, over the span of a ten year period this company has managed to expand and provide qualitiy work for disabled workers through the Ticket to Work Program. We hope to continue to grow and provide more positions nationwide for those who wish to work at home in call monitoring, computer support and non technical jobs as well. I urge anyone who is interested to visit the site http://www.jlodge.com for more information
To Dick – The unemployment is merely a symptom of the disease. The true cancer is high tax, massive regulation, and monumental debt (public and private).
Tax means consumers cannot consume, and business owners have little incentive to form business (fail – lose everything, succeed – give half to government; better off just holding the money you have).
Regulation means businesses cannot function. No cutting trees. No mining mountains. No running generators. No using fertilizer. No making noise. No drilling. No CO2. No bulldozers. Studies must be conducted. Government officials must be pacified. Permits must be granted. Etc. Property rights are a thing of the past.
Finally, the debt situation. 12 trillion dollars financed at a 4% Adjustable Rate = 480 billion per year in interest. When those rock bottom rates adjust up, and the debt is added to, watch the taxpayer get crushed. 16 trillion financed at 6%? OK, we're talking 960 billion a year in interest. You see? They entitlement spending binge in congress has already suffocated this country. We just don't know it yet, as the shell game continues. And this says nothing about personal and corporate debts, equally bad.
I still don't understand how even 10% unemployment (which is usually around 5% in good times) can cause all this doom and gloom for our economy. I mean 90% are employed vs. 95%.
Please explain to me
Congratulations, you have just been exposed to the wonderful world of Groupthink. Anyone who believes that official U3 unemployment rising to 10.2% is a "sign of improvement" needs serious help in analytical thinking. Remember, this is despite trillions of dollars spent and every accounting gimmick in the government bag of tricks. They are still estimating hundreds of thousands of "phantom jobs" being created using thier phony "birth / death" model. Take the red pill, and check out Shadow Stats.
I am curious: do the forecasts of future unemployment reflect extension of jobless benefits? What is the ramification if that action? Does it means the jobless rate will reach 15, 18, 20%?
But the job market does seem to be slowly getting better, not deteriorating.
From what I can see we're still losing jobs! So the job situation is not "getting better", even slowly. What *is* happening is that it is getting worse much more slowly than it was. This is not the same thing as getting better.
When the number of jobs added in any given month is greater than zero, then we can say the job market is getting better.
When talking about enonomists missing forecasts, always keep in mind President Harry Truman:
"Give me a one-handed economist! All my economists say, On the one hand on the other."